Explaining the role of user participation in information system use
Management Science
Multivariate data analysis (4th ed.): with readings
Multivariate data analysis (4th ed.): with readings
Assessing IT usage: the role of prior experience
MIS Quarterly
Creating an effective training environment for enhancing telework
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
Influence of experience on personal computer utilization: testing a conceptual model
Journal of Management Information Systems
A motivational model of microcomputer usage
Journal of Management Information Systems
Acceptance of Future Technologies Using Personal Data: A Focus Group with Young Internet Users
Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Part I: New Trends
HCD 09 Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Human Centered Design: Held as Part of HCI International 2009
A Preliminary Classification of Usage Measures in Information System Acceptance: A Q-Sort Approach
International Journal of Technology Diffusion
Information Resources Management Journal
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Social influence on technology acceptance behavior has been acknowledged but needs to be further articulated. While Subjective Norm (SN) has been dominantly used to capture the essence of social influence, the findings to date has led some researchers to question whether it captures the full extent of social influence. Recently, social psychologists have examined Self-Identity as a construct reflecting social influence on behavior. In particular, Self-Identity has been shown to have significant influence on voluntary behavior and have enduring effects, situations where the Subjective Norm had little effect. This study examines the effect of Self-Identity on technology acceptance decision in the context of a web-based class support system under the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). The result demonstrates a significant direct and indirect effect of Self-Identity on technology acceptance. The result also confirms that Self-Identity has significant direct effect on the acceptance in voluntary and experienced situations, while Subjective Norm has no significant effect in both situations. Key implications for theory and practice are discussed.