Towards a Characterization of Truthful Combinatorial Auctions
FOCS '03 Proceedings of the 44th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science
Complexity of mechanism design
UAI'02 Proceedings of the Eighteenth conference on Uncertainty in artificial intelligence
Instantiating the contingent bids model of truthful interdependent value auctions
AAMAS '06 Proceedings of the fifth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems
A Technique for Large Automated Mechanism Design Problems
IAT '06 Proceedings of the IEEE/WIC/ACM international conference on Intelligent Agent Technology
Approximating revenue-maximizing combinatorial auctions
AAAI'05 Proceedings of the 20th national conference on Artificial intelligence - Volume 1
Revenue monotonicity in combinatorial auctions
AAAI'07 Proceedings of the 22nd national conference on Artificial intelligence - Volume 1
Algorithms and theory of computation handbook
Comparing multiagent systems research in combinatorial auctions and voting
Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence
Discovering theorems in game theory: Two-person games with unique pure Nash equilibrium payoffs
Artificial Intelligence
Modeling negotiation in combinatorial auctions based on multi-agent
PRIMA'06 Proceedings of the 9th Pacific Rim international conference on Agent Computing and Multi-Agent Systems
Approximating optimal combinatorial auctions for complements using restricted welfare maximization
IJCAI'11 Proceedings of the Twenty-Second international joint conference on Artificial Intelligence - Volume Volume One
Mixed-bundling auctions with reserve prices
Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - Volume 2
Analysis and optimization of multi-dimensional percentile mechanisms
IJCAI'13 Proceedings of the Twenty-Third international joint conference on Artificial Intelligence
Hi-index | 0.00 |
We study the recognized open problem of designing revenue-maximizing combinatorial auctions. It is unsolved even for two bidders and two items for sale. Rather than pursuing the pure economic approach of attempting to characterize the optimal auction, we explore techniques for automatically modifying existing mechanisms in a way that increase expected revenue. We introduce a general family of auctions, based on bidder weighting and allocation boosting, which we call virtual valuations combinatorial auctions (VVCA). All auctions in the family are based on the Vickrey-Clarke-Groves (VCG) mechanism, executed on virtual valuations that are linear transformations of the bidders' real valuations. The restriction to linear transformations is motivated by incentive compatibility. The auction family is parameterized by the coefficients in the linear transformations. The problem of designing a high revenue mechanism is therefore reduced to search in the parameter space of VVCA. We analyze the complexity of the search for the optimal such mechanism and conclude that the search problem is computationally hard. Despite that, optimal parameters for VVCA can be found at least in settings with few items and bidders (the experiments show that VVCA yield a substantial increase in revenue over the traditionally used VCG). In larger auctions locally optimal parameters, which still yield an improvement over VCG, can be found.