Reaching agreements through argumentation: a logical model and implementation
Artificial Intelligence
Strategic negotiation in multiagent environments
Strategic negotiation in multiagent environments
A negotiation-style framework for non-prioritised revision
TARK '01 Proceedings of the 8th conference on Theoretical aspects of rationality and knowledge
Negotiation as mutual belief revision
AAAI'04 Proceedings of the 19th national conference on Artifical intelligence
Negotiation by abduction and relaxation
Proceedings of the 6th international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems
Coordination in answer set programming
ACM Transactions on Computational Logic (TOCL)
JELIA '08 Proceedings of the 11th European conference on Logics in Artificial Intelligence
A Fixed-Point Property of Logic-Based Bargaining Solution
AI '08 Proceedings of the 21st Australasian Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence: Advances in Artificial Intelligence
Inductive Negotiation in Answer Set Programming
Declarative Agent Languages and Technologies VI
Creating human-machine synergy in negotiation support systems: towards the pocket negotiator
HuCom '08 Proceedings of the 1st International Working Conference on Human Factors and Computational Models in Negotiation
Mutual belief revision: semantics and computation
AAAI'07 Proceedings of the 22nd national conference on Artificial intelligence - Volume 1
A logical model of Nash bargaining solution
IJCAI'05 Proceedings of the 19th international joint conference on Artificial intelligence
Negotiation using logic programming with consistency restoring rules
IJCAI'09 Proceedings of the 21st international jont conference on Artifical intelligence
Constructing consensus logic programs
LOPSTR'06 Proceedings of the 16th international conference on Logic-based program synthesis and transformation
Affective negotiation support systems
Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environments
On the measure of conflicts: Shapley Inconsistency Values
Artificial Intelligence
A logic-based axiomatic model of bargaining
Artificial Intelligence
CLIMA'09 Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Computational logic in multi-agent systems
ECSQARU'05 Proceedings of the 8th European conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
Coordination between logical agents
CLIMA'04 Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems
Logical properties of belief-revision-based bargaining solution
AI'06 Proceedings of the 19th Australian joint conference on Artificial Intelligence: advances in Artificial Intelligence
From axiomatic to strategic models of bargaining with logical beliefs and goals
Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - Volume 1
Confluence operators and their relationships with revision, update and merging
Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence
Hi-index | 0.00 |
This paper provides a logical framework for negotiation between agents that are assumed to be rational, cooperative and truthful. We present a characterisation of the permissible outcomes of a process of negotiation in terms of a set of rationality postulates, as well as a method for constructing exactly the rational outcomes. The framework is extended by describing two modes of negotiation from which an outcome can be reached. In the concessionary mode, agents are required to weaken their demands in order to accommodate the demands of others. In the adaptationist mode, agents are required to adapt to the demands of others in some appropriate fashion. Both concession and adaptation are characterised in terms of rationality postulates. We also provide methods for constructing exactly the rational concessions, as well as the rational adaptations. The central result of the paper is the observation that the outcomes obtained from the concessionary and adaptationist modes both correspond to the rational outcomes. We conclude by pointing out the links between negotiation and AGM belief change, and providing a glimpse of how this may be used to define a notion of preference-based negotiation.