Computers and information technology as a learning aid
Education and Computing
Effects of complex feedback on computer-assisted modular instruction
Computers & Education - Special section on multimedia in engineering education
InfoCruise: Information Navigation Presenting a Focus Facet Based on Context
ACHI '08 Proceedings of the First International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interaction
Gender differences in computer attitudes: Does the school matter?
Computers in Human Behavior
The evolution of multimedia sound
Computers & Education
Students' navigation patterns in the interaction with a mechanics hypermedia program
Computers & Education
Assessing the computer attitudes of students: An Asian perspective
Computers in Human Behavior
Students' attitudes towards integration of ICTs in a reading course: A case in Turkey
Computers & Education
Development and validation of a computer attitude measure for young students (CAMYS)
Computers in Human Behavior
Podcasting: A new technological tool to facilitate good practice in higher education
Computers & Education
Do graphical overviews facilitate or hinder comprehension in hypertext?
Computers & Education
Hi-index | 0.00 |
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of two different methods on primary school teacher candidates' academic achievements and attitudes toward computer-based education, and to define their views on these methods. Both the first experimental group, programmed instruction (PI), and the second experimental group, meaningful learning (ML), included 36 students separately. While a significant difference was found between the groups regarding academic achievements, no significant difference was found between the groups' attitude scores. There was no significant difference between the academic achievements of the students according to their genders in both groups. In addition, while there was no significant difference between the pre-test and post-test attitudes of students in the PI group, a significant difference was determined in the ML group. Generally, in the PI group, students considered the method effective but boring. Besides, students in the ML group had positive views on the method.