Antecedents and consequences of project team cross-functional cooperation
Management Science
Shaping the future: business design through information technology
Shaping the future: business design through information technology
Co-opetition and knowledge transfer
ACM SIGMIS Database - Special issue on infomration systems: current issues and future changes
SMEs, co-opetition and knowledge sharing: the role of information systems
European Journal of Information Systems
Toward Contextualized Theories of Trust: The Role of Trust in Global Virtual Teams
Information Systems Research
Human Factors in Ergonomics & Manufacturing
Knowledge Management: An Organizational Capabilities Perspective
Journal of Management Information Systems
Organisational influences on attitudes in mandatory system use environments: a longitudinal study
International Journal of Business Information Systems
Organisation and employee congruence: a framework for assessing the success of organisational blogs
International Journal of Information Technology and Management
Factors affecting Chinese Ubiquitous Game Service usage intention
International Journal of Mobile Communications
Hi-index | 0.00 |
This study establishes a model by drawing from key postulates and findings under coopetition to explain the formation of perceived job effectiveness in team collaboration. In the proposed model, perceived job effectiveness is influenced directly by knowledge sharing, cooperative attitude, and competitive conflict, while knowledge sharing is influenced by cooperative attitude and competitive conflict. Accordingly, perceived job effectiveness is influenced indirectly by shared value, perceived trust and perceived benefit via the mediation of cooperative attitude and competitive conflict. Empirical testing of this model, by investigating personnel in information technology (IT) organizations, confirms the applicability of coopetition in virtual teams. The test results indicate that all the model paths except one (linking shared vision and competitive conflict) are significant. Finally, managerial implications and limitations of the research are provided.