Approximation algorithms for non-single-minded profit-maximization problems with limited supply

  • Authors:
  • Khaled Elbassioni;Mahmoud Fouz;Chaitanya Swamy

  • Affiliations:
  • Max-Planck-Institut für Informatik, Saarbrücken, Germany;FR Informatik, Universität des Saarlandes, Saarbrücken, Germany;Dept. of Combinatorics and Optimization, Univ. Waterloo, Waterloo, ON

  • Venue:
  • WINE'10 Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Internet and network economics
  • Year:
  • 2010

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

We consider profit-maximization problems for combinatorial auctions with non-single minded valuation functions and limited supply. We obtain fairly general results that relate the approximability of the profit-maximization problem to that of the corresponding social-welfare-maximization (SWM) problem, which is the problem of finding an allocation (S1, ..., Sn) satisfying the capacity constraints that has maximum total value ∑j vj (Sj). Our results apply to both structured valuation classes, such as subadditive valuations, as well as arbitrary valuations. For subadditive valuations (and hence submodular, XOS valuations), we obtain a solution with profit OPTSWM/O(log cmax), where OPTSWM is the optimum social welfare and cmax is the maximum item-supply; thus, this yields an O(log cmax)-approximation for the profit-maximization problem. Furthermore, given any class of valuation functions, if the SWM problem for this valuation class has an LP-relaxation (of a certain form) and an algorithm "verifying" an integrality gap of α for this LP, then we obtain a solution with profit OPTSWM /O(α log cmax), thus obtaining an O(α log cmax)- approximation. The latter result implies an O(√mlog cmax)-approximation for the profit maximization problem for combinatorial auctions with arbitrary valuations, and an O(log cmax)-approximation for the non-single-minded tollbooth problem on trees. For the special case, when the tree is a path, we also obtain an incomparable O(log m)-approximation (via a different approach) for subadditive valuations, and arbitrary valuations with unlimited supply.1