Visualizing decision trees in games to support children's analytic reasoning: any negative effects on gameplay?

Authors:
Robert Haworth;Sousan Sheida Tagh Bostani;Kamran Sedig
Affiliations:
Cognitive Engineering Laboratory, Middlesex College, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada;Cognitive Engineering Laboratory, Middlesex College, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada;Cognitive Engineering Laboratory, Middlesex College, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
Venue:
International Journal of Computer Games Technology
Year:
2010

Citing 8
Cited 0

Using video in the BNR usability lab

Human-computer interaction
Game Design Theory and Practice

Game Design Theory and Practice
Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach

Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach
Marrying HCI/Usability and computer games: a preliminary look

Proceedings of the third Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction
Andrew Rollings and Ernest Adams on Game Design

Andrew Rollings and Ernest Adams on Game Design
Rules of Play: Game Design Fundamentals

Rules of Play: Game Design Fundamentals
Toward operationalization of 'flow' in mathematics learnware

Computers in Human Behavior
Branching storylines in virtual reality environments for leadership development

IAAI'04 Proceedings of the 16th conference on Innovative applications of artifical intelligence

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

The popularity and usage of digital games has increased in recent years, bringing further attention to their design. Some digital games require a significant use of higher order thought processes, such as problem solving and reflective and analytical thinking. Through the use of appropriate and interactive representations, these thought processes could be supported. A visualization of the game's internal structure is an example of this. However, it is unknown whether including these extra representations will have a negative effect on gameplay. To investigate this issue, a digital maze-like game was designed with its underlying structure represented as a decision tree. A qualitative, exploratory study with children was performed to examine whether the tree supported their thought processes and what effects, if any, the tree had on gameplay. This paper reports the findings of this research and discusses the implications for the design of games in general.