Investigating two contradictory views of formative measurement in information systems research

Authors:
Gimun Kim;Bongsik Shin;Varun Grover
Affiliations:
College of Business Administration, Konyang University, Nonsan, Korea;Information and Decision Systems, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA;Department of Management, Clemson University, Clemson, SC
Venue:
MIS Quarterly
Year:
2010

Citing 10
Cited 14

The influence of IT management practice on IT use in large organizations

MIS Quarterly
Critical skills and knowledge requirements of IS professionals: a joint academic/industry investigation

MIS Quarterly - Special issue on IS curricula and pedagogy
Cost-effective strategies for client/server systems

Cost-effective strategies for client/server systems
Profiles of Strategic Information Systems Planning

Information Systems Research
Building Effective Online Marketplaces with Institution-Based Trust

Information Systems Research
Coordination of information technology management: team-based structures and computer-based communication systems

Journal of Management Information Systems - Special issue: Information technology and organization design
Measuring the Flexibility of Information Technology Infrastructure: Exploratory Analysis of a Construct

Journal of Management Information Systems
Impact of Information Technology Management Practices on Customer Service

Journal of Management Information Systems
What happens after ERP implementation: understanding the impact of interdependence and differentiation on plant-level outcomes

MIS Quarterly
Specifying formative constructs in information systems research

MIS Quarterly

IT management capability and its impact on the performance of a CIO

Information and Management
Construct measurement and validation procedures in MIS and behavioral research: integrating new and existing techniques

MIS Quarterly
Incorporating formative measures into covariance-based structural equation models

MIS Quarterly
Understanding the link between information technology capability and organizational agility: an empirical examination

MIS Quarterly
Shackled to the status quo: the inhibiting effects of incumbent system habit, switching costs, and inertia on new system acceptance

MIS Quarterly
Revisiting bias due to construct misspecification: different results from considering coefficients in standardized form

MIS Quarterly
The negative consequences of measurement model misspecification: a response to Aguirre-Urreta and Marakas

MIS Quarterly
The critical importance of construct measurement specification: a response to Aguirre-Urreta and Marakas

MIS Quarterly
Understanding user revisions when using information system features: adaptive system use and triggers

MIS Quarterly
IT-mediated customer service content and delivery in electronic governments: an empirical investigation of the antecedents of service quality

MIS Quarterly
Formative measurement: a critical perspective

ACM SIGMIS Database
Does existing measurement theory support the use of composite and causal indicators in information systems research?

ACM SIGMIS Database
The analysis of formative measurement in IS research: choosing between component-and covariance-based techniques

ACM SIGMIS Database
A longitudinal study of herd behavior in the adoption and continued use of technology

MIS Quarterly

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

The use of formative measurement in the field of Information Systems has increased, arguably due to statistical tools (e.g., PLS) that can test such models. However, in the literature, there exist two contradictory views on the potential deficiency of formative measurement. While opponents who are critical of formative measurement argue that there are native weaknesses of the formative approach in model estimation, propo nents who are in favor of using formative measurement counter that opponents' research methods in measurement model specification are flawed. The goal of this work is to empirically test these opposing views on whether the alleged estimation instability of formative measurement is due to measurement model misspecification or simply the shortcoming of formative measurement. To assess the integrity of arguments of both parties, we adopt a research design in which four different cases are tested in terms of interpretational confounding and external consistency. We find that regardless of whether there is a specification issue, formative measures can lead to misleading outcomes. Based on the results, we offer guidelines that researchers may adopt in planning and executing data analysis with structural equation modeling. Given that the use of formative measurement is at a critical juncture in the IS field, we believe that the guidelines in this research note are important to promote appropriate use of the approach rather than relegate it to a bandwagon effect.