Decision making in academia: A case of the dean selection process

  • Authors:
  • Ray Gibney;Jennifer Shang

  • Affiliations:
  • Katz Graduate School of Business, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, United States;Katz Graduate School of Business, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, United States

  • Venue:
  • Mathematical and Computer Modelling: An International Journal
  • Year:
  • 2007

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.99

Visualization

Abstract

This study describes the use of the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) in the dean selection process. A subcommittee of the dean search task force created an order-ranking based upon group discussions as well as through the application of the AHP. The results of the two processes were compared against the Provost's final decision. Discrepancies were analyzed and explained. The results suggest that root cause of the differences was a variation in emphasis on certain criteria. The authors conclude that AHP is a valuable tool and should be incorporated into personnel selection processes in academia. The AHP provides a convenient and effective tool for evaluating personnel. Fears that it might prove overly complex or difficult for non-technical people to use proved to be unfounded.