User interface evaluation in the real world: a comparison of four techniques
CHI '91 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Comparison of empirical testing and walkthrough methods in user interface evaluation
CHI '92 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Heuristic Evaluation of Groupware Based on the Mechanics of Collaboration
EHCI '01 Proceedings of the 8th IFIP International Conference on Engineering for Human-Computer Interaction
What they want and what they get: a study of light-weight technologies for online communities
Proceedings of the Latin American conference on Human-computer interaction
Evidence-Based Software Engineering
Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Software Engineering
Appropriating and assessing heuristics for mobile computing
Proceedings of the working conference on Advanced visual interfaces
The semiotic inspection method
IHC '06 Proceedings of VII Brazilian symposium on Human factors in computing systems
Semiotic engineering in practice: redesigning the CoScripter interface
AVI '08 Proceedings of the working conference on Advanced visual interfaces
Systematic literature reviews in software engineering - A systematic literature review
Information and Software Technology
Proceedings of the VIII Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Avaliação da manas na identificação de problemas de impacto social: um estudo de caso
Proceedings of the VIII Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Can inspection methods generate valid new knowledge in HCI? The case of semiotic inspection
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
Using Semiotic Inspection Method to Evaluate a Human-Robot Interface
LA-WEB '09 Proceedings of the 2009 Latin American Web Congress (la-web 2009)
Semiotic inspection method in the context of educational simulation games
Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing
Face-to-face sociability signs made explicit in CMC
INTERACT'07 Proceedings of the 11th IFIP TC 13 international conference on Human-computer interaction
Investigating the Applicability of the Semiotic Inspection Method to Collaborative Systems
SBSC '09 Proceedings of the 2009 Simpósio Brasileiro de Sistemas Colaborativos
Semiotic Engineering Methods for Scientific Research in HCI
Semiotic Engineering Methods for Scientific Research in HCI
Semiotic Inspection of a Game for Children with Down Syndrome
SBGAMES '10 Proceedings of the 2010 Brazilian Symposium on Games and Digital Entertainment
Estratégias para comunicar qualidade na Wikipedia
Proceedings of the IX Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems
An initial analysis of communicability evaluation methods through a case study
CHI '12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Proceedings of the 11th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Assessing the semiotic inspection method: the evaluators' perspective
Proceedings of the 11th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Sistema de apoio à aplicação do MIS
Companion Proceedings of the 11th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Critérios para Identificação do Foco de Métodos de Avaliação para Sistemas Colaborativos
Proceedings of the X Brazilian Symposium in Collaborative Systems
Caracterização qualitativa da sociabilidade no Facebook
Proceedings of the 12th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Proceedings of the 12th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
In 2006 the Semiotic Inspection Method (SIM) was proposed and the authors raised the hypothesis that it was a technology and domain independent evaluation method. The aim of this study was to investigate whether published studies describing the use of SIM support this claim. In order to identify the papers to be analyzed a systematic literature review was conducted. Analysis of the papers indicated that SIM has been applied without adaptations to different domains and in each of them it has been able to identify issues specific to the domain. Hence, our findings support the claim that the method is independent of both domain and technology.