An architecture for object management in OIS
ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS)
Design implications of a task-driven approach to unstructured cognitive tasks in office work
ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS)
Understanding the office: A social-analytic perspective
ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS)
Diplans: a new language for the study and implementation of coordination
ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS)
Computer systems and the design of organizational interaction
ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS)
Functional analysis of office requirements: a multiperspective approach
Functional analysis of office requirements: a multiperspective approach
An object-oriented requirements specifications method
Communications of the ACM
Understanding object-oriented: a unifying paradigm
Communications of the ACM
The object-oriented systems life cycle
Communications of the ACM
Knowledge-based office automation and CSCW
Studies in computer supported cooperative work
A speech-act-based office modeling approach
ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS)
The design requirements of office systems
ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS)
Object-Oriented Software Construction
Object-Oriented Software Construction
Structured Systems Analysis: Tools and Techniques
Structured Systems Analysis: Tools and Techniques
Chaos as coordination technology
CSCW '86 Proceedings of the 1986 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work
Structured Analysis and System Specification
Structured Analysis and System Specification
Structured Analysis for Requirements Definition
IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
A strategy for evaluating alternative information system designs for business process reengineering
International Journal of Information Management: The Journal for Information Professionals
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
Eleven sample office methodologies representing a good, broad cross-section of the existing office methodologies in terms of domain of analysis, office description formalisms, etc. are reviewed and critiqued. Drawing on the critique, a set of four core performance criteria for evaluating office methodologies is derived. The four criteria are: (1) domain of analysis to cover the whole spectrum of office work: (2) understandability and communicability of office descriptions; (3) the concept of levelling; and (4) sound, theoretical basis for generating solutions/recommendations. While several methodologies scored well in the critique, none appeared to satisfy completely all the four criteria which we used to define a 'good' methodology.