Impact of multimodal feedback on simulated ergonomic measurements in a virtual environment: A case study with manufacturing workers

  • Authors:
  • Bo Hu;Wei Zhang;Gavriel Salvendy

  • Affiliations:
  • Department of Industrial Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Automotive Safety and Energy, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, P.R. China;Department of Industrial Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Automotive Safety and Energy, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, P.R. China;Department of Industrial Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Automotive Safety and Energy, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, P.R. China

  • Venue:
  • Human Factors in Ergonomics & Manufacturing
  • Year:
  • 2012

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of multimodal feedback on ergonomic measurements in a virtual environment (VE) for a typical simulated drilling task. In total, sixty male manufacturing industry workers were divided into five groups. One group performed the working task in a real environment (RE), and ergonomic measurements for this group were used as the baseline for evaluation. The other four groups performed the same task in a virtual environment with different feedback treatments (visual with or without auditory and/or tactile feedback). Five indices – task completion time, maximum force capacity reduction, body part discomfort, rated perceived exertion, and rated task difficulty – were used to evaluate the measurements of each of the four treatments in VE in comparison to the baseline group in RE. The results indicate that the five indices for each of the four treatment groups were significantly higher than those of the RE group. Moreover, the indices of the visual-only group were significantly higher than those of the other three groups with auditory and/or tactile feedback treatments. The findings of this study can provide a guideline for ergonomic evaluations of work designs in VE and for establishing a virtual reality simulation system. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.