Dispute resolution in accessible voting systems: the design and use of audiotegrity

  • Authors:
  • Tyler Kaczmarek;John Wittrock;Richard Carback;Alex Florescu;Jan Rubio;Noel Runyan;Poorvi L. Vora;Filip Zagórski

  • Affiliations:
  • Department of Computer Science, The George Washington University;Department of Computer Science, The George Washington University;Network and Information Concepts Group, Charles Stark Draper Laboratories;Department of Computer Science, The George Washington University;Department of Computer Science, The George Washington University;Personal Data Systems;Department of Computer Science, The George Washington University;Institute of Mathematics and Computer Science, Wroclaw University of Technology, Poland

  • Venue:
  • Vote-ID'13 Proceedings of the 4th international conference on E-Voting and Identity
  • Year:
  • 2013

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

We describe in detail dispute resolution problems with cryptographic voting systems that do not produce a paper record of the unencrypted vote. With these in mind, we describe the design and use of Audiotegrity--a cryptographic voting protocol and corresponding voting system with some of the accessibility benefits of fully-electronic voting systems and some of the dispute resolution properties of paper-ballot-based systems. We also describe subtle issues with coercion-resistance if accessible systems are not well-designed. Audiotegrity was designed in response to a request by Takoma Park election officials, tested in a public test organized by the city in June 2011, and used in its municipal election in November 2011. We are not aware of any other precinct-based end-to-end independently-verifiable election for public office where the protocol enabled participation by voters with visual disabilities.