High-performance fractal coherence

  • Authors:

  • Gwendolyn Voskuilen;T.N. Vijaykumar

  • Affiliations:

  • Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA;Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA

  • Venue:
  • Proceedings of the 19th international conference on Architectural support for programming languages and operating systems
  • Year:
  • 2014

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Bugs in cache coherence protocols can cause system failures. Despite many advances, verification runs into state explosion for even moderately-sized systems. As multicores' core counts increase, coherence verifiability continues to be a key problem. A recent proposal, called fractal coherence, avoids the state explosion problem by applying the idea of observational equivalence between a larger system and its smaller sub-systems. A fractal protocol for a larger system is verified by design if a minimal sub-system is verified completely. While fractal coherence is a significant step forward, there are two shortcomings: (1) Architectural limitation: To achieve fractal coherence's logical hierarchy, TreeFractal, the specific fractal protocol, employs a tree architecture where each miss traverses many levels up and down the tree and each level redundantly holds its sub-trees' coherence tags. (2) Protocol restrictions: TreeFractal imposes a restriction on responses to read requests that forces read requests to obtain clean blocks from the nearest sharer even if the shared L2 or L3 is faster. These limitations impose significant performance and coherence tag state overheads. In this paper, we propose architectural support for coherence protocols to achieve scalable performance and verifiability. To address the architectural limitation, we propose FlatFractal, a directory-based architecture which decouples fractal coherence's logical hierarchy from the architecture and eliminates redundant tag state. To address the protocol restriction, we propose a simple change to the protocol that, while preserving observational equivalence, allows read requests to obtain the blocks from the shared L2 or L3. Our simulations show that for 16 cores, FlatFractal performs, on average, 57% better than TreeFractal and within 3% of a conventional directory.