DAC '82 Proceedings of the 19th Design Automation Conference
Nutcracker: an efficient and intelligent channel spacer
DAC '87 Proceedings of the 24th ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference
On minimizing the number of L-shaped channels
DAC '91 Proceedings of the 28th ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference
Manhattan-diagonal routing in channels and switchboxes
ACM Transactions on Design Automation of Electronic Systems (TODAES)
Diagonal routing in high performance microprocessor design
ASP-DAC '06 Proceedings of the 2006 Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
The concept of L-shaped channels was first introduced in RRDO [1] to generate a feasible routing order for nonslicing-structure placement in building-block layout design. This paper presents two approaches for the L-shaped channel-routing problem. In the Manhattan approach, only horizontal and vertical wires are used. The L-shaped channel is divided into two subchannels. The vertical subchannel will be routed first, then the horizontal subchannel will be routed by a special channel router which can handle fixed terminals on 3 sides. Since the routing constraints will change during the boundary movement, several iterations may be needed to complete the routing. In the non-Manhattan approach, 45 ° wires are used to preserve the routing constraints when the boundary is moved in the 45 ° direction. With all the vertical constraints substituted by 45 ° constraints, the L-shaped channel-routing problem can be directly mapped into the straight-type channel-routing problem. Horizontal or vertical extension wires are used to connect terminals on an indented boundary and to separate terminals which are too close to allow the generation of 45 ° wires. Experimental results show that both approaches provide good solutions to the L-shaped channel-routing problem.