Random Pattern Testing Versus Deterministic Testing of RAMs
IEEE Transactions on Computers
IBM Journal of Research and Development
Testing semiconductor memories: theory and practice
Testing semiconductor memories: theory and practice
An efficient design of embedded memories and their testability analysis using Markov chains
Journal of Electronic Testing: Theory and Applications
Test and Testability Techniques for Open Defects in RAM Address Decoders
EDTC '96 Proceedings of the 1996 European conference on Design and Test
Automatic computation of test length for pseudo-random memory tests
MTDT '95 Proceedings of the 1995 IEEE International Workshop on Memory Technology, Design and Testing
Comments on "An Optimal Algorithm for Testing Stuck-at Faults in Random Access Memories"
IEEE Transactions on Computers
Hi-index | 0.00 |
The increasing emphasis on reducing thedefect level of shipped memory parts demands very highfault coverage of memory tests. Deterministic tests havethe advantage of 100% fault coverage for the targeted(i.e., anticipated) faults. However, with each newtechnology, new layout and new fab process, new typesof defects will show up; the probability of occurrence ofthese defects is not known before production start and, inaddition, may vary during the time period the parts areproduced.Pseudo-random (PR) memory tests are tests whichhave the capability to detect any fault (defect) of anymodel; albeit with some probability less than 100%; thefault coverage is modular and depends on the test time,which makes them very attractive. However, problemsarise when commercial testers have to be used forapplying PR tests. This paper illustrates these problemsand shows how they can be overcome. The results areapplicable to a large class of commercial memory testersthereby making them useable for PR memory tests.