Determining the Epipolar Geometry and its Uncertainty: A Review
International Journal of Computer Vision
International Journal of Computer Vision - 1998 Marr Prize
ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR)
ROR: Rejection of Outliers by Rotations
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
Multiple view geometry in computer vision
Multiple view geometry in computer vision
Computer Vision: A Modern Approach
Computer Vision: A Modern Approach
Motion From Point Matches Using Affine Epipolar Geometry
ECCV '94 Proceedings of the Third European Conference-Volume II on Computer Vision - Volume II
Making Good Features Track Better
CVPR '98 Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
In defence of the 8-point algorithm
ICCV '95 Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Computer Vision
Comparing and Evaluating Interest Points
ICCV '98 Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Computer Vision
An Inertial and Visual Sensing System for a Small Autonomous Helicopter
Journal of Robotic Systems
Fusion of Vision and Inertial Data for Motion and Structure Estimation
Journal of Robotic Systems
Outlier rejection for cameras on intelligent vehicles
Pattern Recognition Letters
Hi-index | 0.12 |
This paper introduces a method for rejecting the false matches of points between successive views in a video sequence used to perform Pose from Motion for a mobile sensing platform. Typical methods for pose estimation require point correspondences to estimate the epipolar geometry between the two views. Algorithms for determining these correspondences invariably output false matches along with the good. We present an algorithm for identifying and removing these mismatches for scenes generated by a mobile scanning platform. The algorithm utilizes the motion characteristics of a rear-wheel drive sensing platform to identify correct point matches through their common motion trajectories. Our algorithm works in cases where the percentage of false matches may be as high as 80%, providing a set of correspondences whose correct/incorrect match ratio is higher than the mutual best match approach found in the literature. This algorithm is intended as a post-processing step for any point correspondence algorithm and its output can be used in standard pose estimation algorithms to enhance their speed and accuracy. Experimental results show the computational savings of our approach over the mutual best match method, resulting in comparable or better outlier rejection-increasing the true/false match ratio by 2-3 times-in only a fraction of the time.