Modeling self-efficacy in intelligent tutoring systems: An inductive approach

  • Authors:

  • Scott W. Mcquiggan;Bradford W. Mott;James C. Lester

  • Affiliations:

  • Department of Computer Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, USA;Emergent Game Technologies, Chapel Hill, USA;Department of Computer Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, USA

  • Venue:
  • User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction
  • Year:
  • 2008

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Self-efficacy is an individual's belief about her ability to perform well in a given situation. Because self-efficacious students are effective learners, endowing intelligent tutoring systems with the ability to diagnose self-efficacy could lead to improved pedagogy. Self-efficacy is influenced by (and influences) affective state. Thus, physiological data might be used to predict a student's level of self-efficacy. This article investigates an inductive approach to automatically constructing models of self-efficacy that can be used at runtime to inform pedagogical decisions. It reports on two complementary empirical studies. In the first study, two families of self-efficacy models were induced: a static self-efficacy model, learned solely from pre-test (non-intrusively collected) data, and a dynamic self-efficacy model, learned from both pre-test data as well as runtime physiological data collected with a biofeedback apparatus. In the second empirical study, a similar experimental design was applied to an interactive narrative-centered learning environment. Self-efficacy models were induced from combinations of static and dynamic information, including pre-test data, physiological data, and observations of student behavior in the learning environment. The highest performing induced naïve Bayes models correctly classified 85.2% of instances in the first empirical study and 82.1% of instances in the second empirical study. The highest performing decision tree models correctly classified 86.9% of instances in the first study and 87.3% of instances in the second study.