Instrumental interaction: an interaction model for designing post-WIMP user interfaces
Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Game Design Theory and Practice
Game Design Theory and Practice
Heuristics for designing enjoyable user interfaces: Lessons from computer games
CHI '82 Proceedings of the 1982 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Game Design Workshop: Designing, Prototyping, and Playtesting Games
Game Design Workshop: Designing, Prototyping, and Playtesting Games
Evaluation of video game interfaces
UAHCI'11 Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Universal access in human-computer interaction: design for all and eInclusion - Volume Part I
Towards minimalist game design
Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Foundations of Digital Games
Controlling your game controls: interface and customization
GLS'11 Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Games + Learning + Society Conference
Herding nerds on your table: NerdHerder, a mobile augmented reality game
CHI '12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
NerdHerder: designing for physical actions in an augmented reality puzzle game
Proceedings of the International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games
Duel reality: a sword-fighting game for novel gameplay around intentionally hiding body data
Proceedings of The 9th Australasian Conference on Interactive Entertainment: Matters of Life and Death
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
In video game literature and video game reviews, video games are often divided into two distinct parts: interface and gameplay. Good video games, it is assumed, have easy to use interfaces, but they also provide difficult gameplay challenges to the player. But must a good game follow this pattern, and what is the difference between interface and gameplay? When does the easy-to-use interface stop, and when does the challenging gameplay begin? By analyzing a number of games, the paper argues that it is rare to find a clear-cut border between interface and gameplay and that the fluidity of this border characterizes games in general. While this border is unclear, we also analyze a number of games where the challenge is unambiguously located in the interface, thereby demonstrating that "easy interface and challenging gameplay" is neither universal nor a requirement for game quality. Finally, the paper argues, the lack of a clear distinction between easy interface and challenging gameplay is due to the fact that games are fundamentally designed not to accomplish something through an activity, but to provide an activity that is pleasurable in itself.