The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.)
The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.)
Affective computing
interactions
Affect and machine design: Lessons for the development of autonomous machines
IBM Systems Journal
Physiological indicators for the evaluation of co-located collaborative play
CSCW '04 Proceedings of the 2004 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work
Comparing two approaches to context: realism and constructivism
Proceedings of the 4th decennial conference on Critical computing: between sense and sensibility
Measuring emotional valence during interactive experiences: boys at video game play
Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
The sensual evaluation instrument: developing an affective evaluation tool
Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
How emotion is made and measured
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
Supple interfaces: designing and evaluating for richer human connections and experiences
CHI '07 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Personal and Ubiquitous Computing
Interaction design in the university: designing disciplinary interactions
CHI '10 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Proceedings of the Ergonomie et Informatique Avancee Conference
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Recently researchers from a range of disciplines have begun inquiring into the place of emotion in the design and use of technology to ask how, and in what ways, products and systems evoke emotions in people and how these emotions can be understood, measured, or more generally assessed? This diversity of perspectives has brought theoretical and methodological richness to the field, yet has made it increasing challenging to make sense of the literature. This paper argues that by organizing these diverse accounts of design according to the underlying epistemology and theoretical perspective, it is possible to accommodate a variety of approaches and provide a way to give meaning to the diverse outcomes. Published papers representing a range of the approaches to research on human emotion were identified in the literature, and assessed in terms of researcher motivation, the way "emotion" is conceptualized and operationalized, the nature of the knowledge claims, and the background assumptions of the authors, both implicit and explicit. By mapping research production to more fundamental assumptions and values, a space is opened for more constructive and nuanced dialog on the validity, meaning, and significance of diversity for advancing the field overall.