Refining the test phase of usability evaluation: how many subjects is enough?
Human Factors - Special issue: measurement in human factors
Finding usability problems through heuristic evaluation
CHI '92 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Estimating the number of subjects needed for a thinking aloud test
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
Validating the SUE inspection technique
AVI '00 Proceedings of the working conference on Advanced visual interfaces
Empirical development of a heuristic evaluation methodology for shared workspace groupware
CSCW '02 Proceedings of the 2002 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work
Perspective-based Usability Inspection: An Empirical Validationof Efficacy
Empirical Software Engineering
Testing web sites: five users is nowhere near enough
CHI '01 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Analysis of combinatorial user effect in international usability tests
Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Human-Computer Interaction
Interacting with hypertext: a meta-analysis of experimental studies
Human-Computer Interaction
Weak inter-rater reliability in heuristic evaluation of video games
CHI '11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Gamers as usability evaluators: a study in the domain of virtual worlds
Proceedings of the 11th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Since many empirical results have been accumulated in usability evaluation research, it would be very useful to provide usability practitioners with generalized guidelines by analyzing the combined results. This study aims at estimating individual detection rate for user-based testing and heuristic evaluation through meta-analysis, and finding significant factors, which affect individual detection rates. Based on the results of 18 user-based testing and heuristic evaluation experiments, individual detection rates in user-based testing and heuristic evaluation were estimated as 0.36 and 0.14, respectively. Expertise and task type were found as significant factors to improve individual detection rate in heuristic evaluation.