On the complexity of equilibria
STOC '02 Proceedings of the thiry-fourth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing
Truth revelation in approximately efficient combinatorial auctions
Journal of the ACM (JACM)
An approximate truthful mechanism for combinatorial auctions with single parameter agents
SODA '03 Proceedings of the fourteenth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms
Leontief economies encode nonzero sum two-player games
SODA '06 Proceedings of the seventeenth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithm
Theoretical Computer Science
A path to the Arrow–Debreu competitive market equilibrium
Mathematical Programming: Series A and B
A Polynomial Time Algorithm for Computing an Arrow-Debreu Market Equilibrium for Linear Utilities
SIAM Journal on Computing
Market equilibrium via a primal--dual algorithm for a convex program
Journal of the ACM (JACM)
Market Equilibria in Polynomial Time for Fixed Number of Goods or Agents
FOCS '08 Proceedings of the 2008 49th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science
The Price of Stability for Network Design with Fair Cost Allocation
SIAM Journal on Computing
Approximately-strategyproof and tractable multiunit auctions
Decision Support Systems - Special issue: The fourth ACM conference on electronic commerce
STACS'99 Proceedings of the 16th annual conference on Theoretical aspects of computer science
Nash equilibria in fisher market
SAGT'10 Proceedings of the Third international conference on Algorithmic game theory
Computation and incentives of competitive equilibria in a matching market
SAGT'11 Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Algorithmic game theory
Incentive ratios of fisher markets
ICALP'12 Proceedings of the 39th international colloquium conference on Automata, Languages, and Programming - Volume Part II
Hi-index | 0.00 |
It is common wisdom that individuals behave strategically in economic environments. We consider Fisher markets with Leontief utilities and study strategic behaviors of individual buyers in market equilibria. While simple examples illustrate that buyers do get larger utilities when behaving strategically, we show that the benefits can be quite limited: We introduce the concept of incentive ratio to capture the extent to which utility can be increased by strategic behaviors of an individual, and show that the incentive ratio of Leontief markets is less than 2. We also reveal that the incentive ratios are insensitive to market sizes. Potentially, the concept incentive ratio can have applications in other strategic settings as well.