Motivating all our students?

  • Authors:

  • Janet Carter;Dennis Bouvier;Rachel Cardell-Oliver;Margaret Hamilton;Stanislav Kurkovsky;Stefanie Markham;O. William McClung;Roger McDermott;Charles Riedesel;Jian Shi;Su White

  • Affiliations:

  • University of Kent, Canterbury, United Kingdom;Southern Illinois University, Edwardsville, IL, USA;University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia;RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia;Central Connecticut State University, New Britain, CT, USA;Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA;Nebraska Wesleyan University, Lincoln, NE, USA;Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, Scotland Uk;University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA;University of Southampton, Southampton, Hants, Scotland Uk;University of Southampton, Southampton, Hants, Scotland Uk

  • Venue:
  • Proceedings of the 16th annual conference reports on Innovation and technology in computer science education - working group reports
  • Year:
  • 2011

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.01

Visualization

Abstract

Academics expend a large amount of time and effort to sustain and enhance the motivation of undergraduate students. Typically based on a desire to ensure that all students achieve their full potential, approaches are based on an understanding that students who are highly motivated will learn more. Furthermore, institutional rewards accrue from effective use of academics' time, along with financial benefits associated with high levels of retention and progression. This working group report, based on practice in Europe, Australasia and North America, builds on previous work. It provides an updated and revised literature review, analyses a larger collection of survey data and has sought to triangulate earlier findings with qualitative data from practitioner interviews. The report covers established approaches in teaching, support and extra-curricular activities. It tracks emerging practice such as streamed and differentiated teaching, and research based and authentic learning. It also considers contemporary innovations in student activities. Finally it reports on a repository of tips and techniques which has been established to support faculty wishing to change or review current methods.