How does Fitts' law fit pointing and dragging?
CHI '90 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
A comparison of input devices in element pointing and dragging tasks
CHI '91 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Studying the movement of high-tech Rodentia: pointing and dragging
CHI '93 INTERACT '93 and CHI '93 Conference Companion on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Testing pointing device performance and user assessment with the ISO 9241, Part 9 standard
Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
User performance in relation to 3D input device design
ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics
Quantitative analysis of scrolling techniques
Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
WHC '05 Proceedings of the First Joint Eurohaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems
A simple movement time model for scrolling
CHI '05 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
RubberEdge: reducing clutching by combining position and rate control with elastic feedback
Proceedings of the 20th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology
Elastic Control for Navigation Tasks on Pen-based Handheld Computers
3DUI '08 Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces
Proceedings of the 16th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology
Free-space pointing with constrained hand movements
CHI '10 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
EGVE'07 Proceedings of the 13th Eurographics conference on Virtual Environments
Hi-index | 0.00 |
The Groovepad is an input device that uses the physical frame of a regular touchpad as an elastic force sensor to permit additional rate-control input. The two independent input sensors can be used separately, but facilitate frequent and fluent switching between position-controlled and rate-controlled interaction techniques. We studied the usability of the Groovepad in pointing, panning, and dragging tasks. Our observations indicate that the use of the two input sensors for the same functionality (e.g.,cursor control) can result in a decision dilemma, which adversely affects performance. As an alternative, we propose to use both sensors for complementary subtasks. For example, we performed workspace panning with the elastic frame of the Groovepad, while cursor motion was operated with the touchpad. This particular mapping possesses the compelling property that the frame of the touchpad serves as a tactile reference of the visual workspace. A user study revealed that our approach was preferred and performed significantly better than techniques that only used touchpad input.