Passive real-world interface props for neurosurgical visualization
CHI '94 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Virtual reality in scientific visualization
Communications of the ACM
Exploring geo-scientific data in virtual environments
VIS '99 Proceedings of the conference on Visualization '99: celebrating ten years
Cooperative object manipulation in immersive virtual environments: framework and techniques
VRST '02 Proceedings of the ACM symposium on Virtual reality software and technology
ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI)
TPCG '03 Proceedings of the Theory and Practice of Computer Graphics 2003
Constructing a Gazebo: supporting teamwork in a tightly coupled, distributed task in virtual reality
Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments
The Bent Pick Ray: An Extended Pointing Technique for Multi-User Interaction
3DUI '06 Proceedings of the 3D User Interfaces
3DUI '06 Proceedings of the 3D User Interfaces
jReality: a java library for real-time interactive 3D graphics and audio
MM '09 Proceedings of the 17th ACM international conference on Multimedia
The 3D sketch slice: precise 3d volume annotations in virtual environments
JVRC'09 Proceedings of the 15th Joint virtual reality Eurographics conference on Virtual Environments
3-hand manipulation of virtual objects
JVRC'09 Proceedings of the 15th Joint virtual reality Eurographics conference on Virtual Environments
EGVE - JVRC'10 Proceedings of the 16th Eurographics conference on Virtual Environments & Second Joint Virtual Reality
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
In the context of scientific data analysis, we propose to compare a remote collaborative manipulation technique with a single user manipulation technique. The manipulation task consists in positioning a clipping plane in order to perform cross-sections of scientific data that show several points of interest located inside these data. For the remote collaborative manipulation, we have chosen to use the 3-hand manipulation technique proposed by Aguerreche et al., which is very suitable with a remote manipulation of a plane. We ran two experiments to compare the two manipulation techniques with some participants located in two different countries. These experiments has shown that the remote collaborative manipulation technique was significantly more efficient than the single user manipulation when the 3 points of interest were far apart inside the scientific data and, consequently, when the manipulation task was more difficult and required more precision. When the 3 points of interest were close together, there was not significant difference between the two manipulation techniques.