Radical clashes: what tangible interaction is made of

Authors:
Jelle van Dijk;Camille Moussette;Stoffel Kuenen;Caroline Hummels
Affiliations:
Eindhoven University of Technology, AZ Eindhoven, Netherlands;Umeå University Umeå, Sweden;Umeå University Umeå, Sweden;Eindhoven University of Technology, AZ Eindhoven, Netherlands
Venue:
Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction
Year:
2013

Citing 9
Cited 1

Tangible bits: towards seamless interfaces between people, bits and atoms

Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human factors in computing systems
Where the action is: the foundations of embodied interaction

Where the action is: the foundations of embodied interaction
Getting a grip on tangible interaction: a framework on physical space and social interaction

Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Tangible and embedded interaction

Tangible and Embedded Interaction 2007
Move to get moved: a search for methods, tools and knowledge to design for expressive and rich movement-based interaction

Personal and Ubiquitous Computing
Tangible bits: beyond pixels

Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Tangible and embedded interaction
Towards a new set of ideals: consequences of the practice turn in tangible interaction

Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Tangible and embedded interaction
Radical atoms: beyond tangible bits, toward transformable materials

interactions
How to design for transformation of behavior through interactive materiality

Proceedings of the 7th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Making Sense Through Design

Breaching barriers to collaboration in public spaces

Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Driven by a critique of Ishii et al's recent vision of Radical Atoms we call for a debate on the different conceptual paradigms underlying the TEI community and its activities. TEI was initiated to share and connect different perspectives, but we feel conceptual debate is lacking. To fuel this debate, we start with comparing two paradigms by examining the Radical Atoms proposal and balance it from our design-led perspective. Our aim with this paper is to revive the richness of TEI's multidisciplinary approach.