The benefits of multimodal information: a meta-analysis comparing visual and visual-tactile feedback

  • Authors:
  • Matthew S. Prewett;Liuquin Yang;Frederick R. B. Stilson;Ashley A. Gray;Michael D. Coovert;Jennifer Burke;Elizabeth Redden;Linda R. Elliot

  • Affiliations:
  • University of South Florida, Tampa, FL;University of South Florida, Tampa, FL;University of South Florida, Tampa, FL;University of South Florida, Tampa, FL;University of South Florida, Tampa, FL;University of South Florida, Tampa, FL;ARL/HRED @ SAIC, Fort Benning, GA;ARL/HRED @ SAIC, Fort Benning, GA

  • Venue:
  • Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Multimodal interfaces
  • Year:
  • 2006

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Information display systems have become increasingly complex and more difficult for human cognition to process effectively. Based upon Wicken's Multiple Resource Theory (MRT), information delivered using multiple modalities (i.e., visual and tactile) could be more effective than communicating the same information through a single modality. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to compare user effectiveness when using visual-tactile task feedback (a multimodality) to using only visual task feedback (a single modality). Results indicate that using visual-tactile feedback enhances task effectiveness more so than visual feedback (g = .38). When assessing different criteria, visual-tactile feedback is particularly effective at reducing reaction time (g = .631) and increasing performance (g = .618). Follow up moderator analyses indicate that visual-tactile feedback is more effective when workload is high (g = .844) and multiple tasks are being performed (g = .767). Implications of results are discussed in the paper.