AAAI '99/IAAI '99 Proceedings of the sixteenth national conference on Artificial intelligence and the eleventh Innovative applications of artificial intelligence conference innovative applications of artificial intelligence
Robust Combinatorial Auction Protocol against False-Name Bids
Proceedings of the Seventeenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Twelfth Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence
Robust Double Auction Protocol against False-Name Bids
ICDCS '01 Proceedings of the The 21st International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems
A robust open ascending-price multi-unit auction protocol against false-name bids
Decision Support Systems - Special issue: The fourth ACM conference on electronic commerce
Economic mechanism design for computerized agents
WOEC'95 Proceedings of the 1st conference on USENIX Workshop on Electronic Commerce - Volume 1
Designing Mechanisms for E-Commerce Security: An Example from Sealed-Bid Auctions
International Journal of Electronic Commerce
Journal of Computer and System Sciences
A secure double auction protocol against false bids
Decision Support Systems
A public procurement combinatorial auction mechanism with quality assignment
Decision Support Systems
Vickrey vs. eBay: Why Second-Price Sealed-Bid Auctions Lead to More Realistic Price-Demand Functions
International Journal of Electronic Commerce
Hi-index | 0.00 |
The multi-unit Vickrey-Clark-Groves (VCG) mechanism has two major weaknesses: it has high computational complexity and monotonicity problems [Paul Milgrom. Putting Auction Theory to Work. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2004] such that if goods are not substitutes for all bidders and if a bidder can submit bids under multiple identities, then the VCG is no longer strategy-proof. To address these two weaknesses, we introduce a Binary Vickrey Auction (BVA) where goods are allocated in bundles of sequentially-decreasing power-of-two items in multiple rounds. Because of the discrete allocation operations, the BVA is computationally efficient. It is also robust against buyer multi-identity bidding by discouraging a bidder splitting his single bid for a larger bundle into several bids under multiple bidder identities for smaller bundles because the BVA favors bids for larger bundles with earlier considerations and cheaper prices.