A field study of the software design process for large systems
Communications of the ACM
Managing I/S design teams: a control theories perspective
Management Science
When professional standards are lax: the CONFIRM failure and its lessons
Communications of the ACM
Standardization, requirements uncertainty and software project performance
Information and Management
An expanded instrument for evaluating information system success
Information and Management
Blowing the whistle on troubled software projects
Communications of the ACM
De-escalation of commitment in software projects: who matters? what matters?
Information and Management
Information and Management
Understanding software project risk: a cluster analysis
Information and Management
Perceptions of conflict and success in information systems development projects
Journal of Management Information Systems - Special section: Realizing value from information technology investment
WebQual: An Instrument for Consumer Evaluation of Web Sites
International Journal of Electronic Commerce
An Integrative Contingency Model of Software Project Risk Management
Journal of Management Information Systems
Keeping Mum as the Project Goes Under: Toward an Explanatory Model
Journal of Management Information Systems
Assessing e-learning 2.0 system success
Computers & Education
What makes bloggers share knowledge? An investigation on the role of trust
International Journal of Information Management: The Journal for Information Professionals
Runaway Information Technology Projects: A Punctuated Equilibrium Analysis
International Journal of Information Technology Project Management
Consuming information systems: An economic model of user satisfaction
Decision Support Systems
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Recent research has suggested that flawed status reporting is a serious concern in IS projects. However, the linkage between reporting quality and project performance has not been empirically confirmed. Our investigation consisted of two complementary studies, both of which employed previously validated measures of reporting quality and project outcomes. The first considered the perceptions of 210 IS project members of the quality of status reports they submitted to their project managers. The second considered the perceptions of 485 IS project managers of the quality of project reports they received from project members reporting to them. Both showed that the perceived quality of project reporting was less than perfect and was significantly associated with project task and psychological outcomes. Moreover, the second study results suggested that reporting quality was also related to organizational outcomes. We offer recommendations for project managers.