Comparing early design methods for children

  • Authors:
  • Wouter Sluis-Thiescheffer;Tilde Bekker;Berry Eggen

  • Affiliations:
  • Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands;Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands;Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands

  • Venue:
  • Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Interaction design and children
  • Year:
  • 2007

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

This paper describes a study which compares the outcome of two early design methods for children: brainstorming and prototyping. The hypothesis is that children will uncover more design ideas when prototyping than when brainstorming, because prototyping requires the use of a wider range of Intelligences according to Gardner's Theory of Multiple Intelligences. The protocols were coded using Design Rationale Theory: distinguishing between Options (design solutions) and evaluation Criteria. The results show that as expected children provided more Options in sessions that appeal to a wider range of intelligences. However, unexpectedly children provided more Criteria in the session that appealed mostly to one intelligence.