Commentary on Suchman article and Winograd response
Computer Supported Cooperative Work
ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS)
Human values and the design of computer technology
Human values and the design of computer technology
Cooperative inquiry: developing new technologies for children with children
Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Transcending the individual human mind—creating shared understanding through collaborative design
ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) - Special issue on human-computer interaction in the new millennium, Part 1
Lingua Francas for design: sacred places and pattern languages
DIS '00 Proceedings of the 3rd conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques
Computer Power and Human Reason: From Judgment to Calculation
Computer Power and Human Reason: From Judgment to Calculation
Participatory design of an orientation aid for amnesics
Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Values at play: design tradeoffs in socially-oriented game design
Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Proceedings of the 4th decennial conference on Critical computing: between sense and sensibility
Water models and water politics: design, deliberation, and virtual accountability
dg.o '06 Proceedings of the 2006 international conference on Digital government research
Value sensitive design of interactions with urbansim indicators
Value sensitive design of interactions with urbansim indicators
ECSCW'05 Proceedings of the ninth conference on European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work
Proceedings of the 2007 international ACM conference on Supporting group work
The watcher and the watched: social judgments about privacy in a public place
Human-Computer Interaction
Design methods for ethical persuasive computing
Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology
Information Polity - Government Information Sharing and Integration: Combining the Social and the Technical. Papers from the 9th International Conference on Digital Government Research (d.g.o.2008)
Supporting agile modeling through experimentation in an integrated urban simulation framework
Proceedings of the 11th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference on Public Administration Online: Challenges and Opportunities
Multi-lifespan information system design: investigating a new design approach in Rwanda
Proceedings of the 2011 iConference
Improving the safety of homeless young people with mobile phones: values, form and function
Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Next steps for value sensitive design
Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Pattern language and HCI: expectations and experiences
CHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Inclusive design: bridging theory and practice
EPCE'13 Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics: applications and services - Volume Part II
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
Supporting public participation is often a key goal in the design of digital government systems. However, years of work may be required before a complex system, such as the UrbanSim urban simulation system, is deployed and ready for such participation. In this paper, we investigate laying the foundations for public participation in advance of wide-scale public deployment, with the goal of having interaction designs ready when the system is put into such use. Moreover, in a highly politicized domain such as this one, value advocacy as well as factual information plays a central role. Using the theory and methods of Value Sensitive Design, we address three design goals toward public participation and value advocacy, and provide evidence that each of them was achieved: (1) enabling indirect stakeholders to become direct stakeholders (i.e. enabling more people to interact directly with UrbanSim in useful ways); (2) developing a participatory process by which these stakeholders can help guide the development of the system itself; and (3) enabling participating organizations to engage in value advocacy while at the same time enhancing overall system legitimation.