The notion of data and its quality dimensions
Information Processing and Management: an International Journal
Judgement of information quality and cognitive authority in the Web
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
Epistemic Value Theory and Information Ethics
Minds and Machines
Indicators of accuracy for answers to ready reference questions on the internet
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
Studying cooperation and conflict between authors with history flow visualizations
Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
The Wisdom of Crowds
Communications of the ACM - The semantic e-business vision
A content-driven reputation system for the wikipedia
Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web
When do researchers collaborate? Toward a model of collaboration propensity
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
Improving Wikipedia's accuracy: Is edit age a solution?
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
Social epistemology and information science
Annual Review of Information Science and Technology
Epistemic Values and Information Management
The Information Society - The Philosophy of Information, its Nature, and Future Developments
How and why do college students use Wikipedia?
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
Factors affecting shapers of organizational wikis
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
A five-year study of on-campus Internet use by undergraduate biomedical students
Computers & Education
Using online digital technologies to build knowledge: lessons learned from three initiatives
EC-TEL'11 Proceedings of the 6th European conference on Technology enhanced learning: towards ubiquitous learning
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
Philosophy and information studies
Annual Review of Information Science and Technology
Personal name vocabularies as linked open data: A case study of jazz artist names
Journal of Information Science
Keeping eyes on the prize: officially sanctioned rule breaking in mass collaboration systems
Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work
Understanding trust formation in digital information sources: The case of Wikipedia
Journal of Information Science
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Wikipedia (the “free online encyclopedia that anyone can edit”) is having a huge impact on how a great many people gather information about the world. So, it is important for epistemologists and information scientists to ask whether people are likely to acquire knowledge as a result of having access to this information source. In other words, is Wikipedia having good epistemic consequences? After surveying the various concerns that have been raised about the reliability of Wikipedia, this article argues that the epistemic consequences of people using Wikipedia as a source of information are likely to be quite good. According to several empirical studies, the reliability of Wikipedia compares favorably to the reliability of traditional encyclopedias. Furthermore, the reliability of Wikipedia compares even more favorably to the reliability of those information sources that people would be likely to use if Wikipedia did not exist (viz., Web sites that are as freely and easily accessible as Wikipedia). In addition, Wikipedia has a number of other epistemic virtues (e.g., power, speed, and fecundity) that arguably outweigh any deficiency in terms of reliability. Even so, epistemologists and information scientists should certainly be trying to identify changes (or alternatives) to Wikipedia that will bring about even better epistemic consequences. This article suggests that to improve Wikipedia, we need to clarify what our epistemic values are and to better understand why Wikipedia works as well as it does. Somebody who reads Wikipedia is “rather in the position of a visitor to a public restroom,” says Mr. McHenry, Britannica's former editor. “It may be obviously dirty, so that he knows to exercise great care, or it may seem fairly clean, so that he may be lulled into a false sense of security. What he certainly does not know is who has used the facilities before him.” One wonders whether people like Mr. McHenry would prefer there to be no public lavatories at all. The Economist (Vol. 379, April 22, 2006, pp. 14–15) © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.