A field study of the software design process for large systems
Communications of the ACM
Artifact as theory-nexus: hermeneutics meets theory-based design
CHI '89 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Applying design methodology to software development
Proceedings of the 1st conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, & techniques
Reflective conversation with materials
Bringing design to software
Design-oriented human-computer interaction
Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Ambiguity as a resource for design
Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
A science of design for software-intensive systems
Communications of the ACM - Interactive immersion in 3D graphics
Dispelling "design" as the black art of CHI
Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Staying open to interpretation: engaging multiple meanings in design and evaluation
DIS '06 Proceedings of the 6th conference on Designing Interactive systems
Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI
Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Trouble-spotting photoshows: capturing everyday HCI experiences
CHI '10 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Design's processional character
Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems
Hi-index | 0.01 |
We report results from interviews with HCI design researchers on their perceptions of how their research relates to the more traditional scientific goal of providing explanations. Theories of explanation are prominent in the physical and natural sciences, psychology, the social sciences, and engineering. Little work though has so-far addressed the special case of how results from reflective design of interactive systems can help provide explanations. We found conceptions of explanation in design research to be broader and more inclusive than those commonly found in the philosophy of science. We synthesized concepts from the interviews into a framework which may help researchers understand how their contributions relate to both classical and emergent conceptions of explanation.