How are windows used? Some notes on creating an empirically-based windowing benchmark task
CHI '86 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG)
Direct manipulation for comprehensible, predictable and controllable user interfaces
Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Intelligent user interfaces
How people revisit web pages: empirical findings and implications for the design of history systems
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies - Special issue: World Wide Web usability
Partitioning digital worlds: focal and peripheral awareness in multiple monitor use
Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
UMEA: translating interaction histories into project contexts
Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Elastic windows: improved spatial layout and rapid multiple window operations
AVI '96 Proceedings of the workshop on Advanced visual interfaces
Proceedings of the working conference on Advanced visual interfaces
Scalable Fabric: flexible task management
Proceedings of the working conference on Advanced visual interfaces
TaskTracer: a desktop environment to support multi-tasking knowledge workers
Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces
SWISH: semantic analysis of window titles and switching history
Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces
WindowScape: a task oriented window manager
UIST '06 Proceedings of the 19th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology
A predictive model of menu performance
Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Visualizing Changes of Hierarchical Data using Treemaps
IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
RelAltTab: assisting users in switching windows
Proceedings of the 13th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces
Taskposé: exploring fluid boundaries in an associative window visualization
Proceedings of the 21st annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology
The CLOTHO project: predicting application utility
Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems
Piles, tabs and overlaps in navigation among documents
Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Extending Boundaries
Perception de la profondeur en gestion de fenêtres
Conference Internationale Francophone sur I'Interaction Homme-Machine
Supporting window switching with spatially consistent thumbnail zones: design and evaluation
INTERACT'11 Proceedings of the 13th IFIP TC 13 international conference on Human-computer interaction - Volume Part I
WindowScape: Lessons learned from a task-centric window manager
ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI)
Improving command selection with CommandMaps
Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Interactive Self-Organizing Windows
Computer Graphics Forum
Testing the robustness and performance of spatially consistent interfaces
Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Exploiting spatial memory to design efficient command interfaces
CHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Switching between windows on a computer is a frequent activity, but current switching mechanisms make it difficult to find items. We carried out a longitudinal study that recorded actual window switching behaviour. We found that window revisitation is very common, and that people spend most time working with a small set of windows and applications. We identify two design principles from these observations. First, spatial constancy in the layout of items in a switching interface can aid memorability and support revisitation. Second, gradually adjusting the size of application and window zones in a switcher can improve visibility and targeting for frequently-used items. We carried out two studies to confirm the value of these design ideas. The first showed that spatially stable layouts are significantly faster than the commonly-used recency layout. The second showed that gradual adjustments to accommodate new applications and windows do not reduce performance.