Modeling the Unmodelable: Algorithmic Fault Diagnosis
IEEE Design & Test
Diagnosing combinational logic designs using the single location at-a-time (SLAT) paradigm
Proceedings of the IEEE International Test Conference 2001
Multiplets, Models, and the Search for Meaning: Improving Per-Test Fault Diagnosis
ITC '02 Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE International Test Conference
Testing of Digital Systems
VLSI Test Principles and Architectures: Design for Testability (Systems on Silicon)
VLSI Test Principles and Architectures: Design for Testability (Systems on Silicon)
IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems
Diagnosing arbitrary defects in logic designs using single location at a time (SLAT)
IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems
IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems
Analysis and methodology for multiple-fault diagnosis
IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems
Multiple-Fault Diagnosis Based On Adaptive Diagnostic Test Pattern Generation
IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems
Hi-index | 0.00 |
We propose a multiple-fault diagnosis method with high diagnosability, resolution, first-hit and short run time. The method has no assumption on fault models, thus can diagnose arbitrary faults. To cope with the multiple-fault mask and reinforcement effect, two key techniques of construction and scoring of fault-tuple equivalence trees are introduced to choose and rank the final candidate locations. Experimental results show that, when the circuits have 2 arbitrary faults, the average diagnosability and resolution are 98% and 0.95, respectively, with the best case 100% and 1.00. Moreover, in average, even when 21 arbitrary faults exist, our method can still identify 93% of them with the resolution 0.78, increased by 41% and 39% in comparison with the latest work where the diagnosability and resolution are 66% and 0.56. Finally, 96% of our top-ranked candidate locations are actual fault locations.