Composition of HCI evaluation methods for hybrid virtual environments

  • Authors:
  • Marcus F. C. Alencar;Alberto B. Raposo;Simone D. J. Barbosa

  • Affiliations:
  • PUC-Rio, Brazil;PUC-Rio, Brazil;PUC-Rio, Brazil

  • Venue:
  • Proceedings of the 2011 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing
  • Year:
  • 2011

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Research about interaction design and evaluation of virtual environment (VE) applications is recent and lacks well-established methods and techniques. The focus of this study is to show the results of applying a composition of methods to evaluate the communicability and usability of the HybridDesk, which provides three environments for the interaction with VEs, supporting 3D scene visualization and navigation, as well as 3D object manipulation and annotation. This study performs a qualitative evaluation of the HybridDesk by applying traditional usability evaluation methods, like heuristic evaluation, usage observation sessions, questionnaires and interviews, as well as the communicability evaluation method (CEM), which is based on semiotic engineering. It then compares the evaluation results of these various methods, demonstrating that they all contribute in distinct ways to the evaluation of a hybrid environment. These results also highlight the importance of compatibility among the various signification systems, produced by distinct designers, which a user needs to interpret and understand during interaction.