Object associations: a simple and practical approach to virtual 3D manipulation
I3D '95 Proceedings of the 1995 symposium on Interactive 3D graphics
The Rockin'Mouse: integral 3D manipulation on a plane
Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human factors in computing systems
Usability analysis of 3D rotation techniques
Proceedings of the 10th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology
Skitters and jacks: interactive 3D positioning tools
I3D '86 Proceedings of the 1986 workshop on Interactive 3D graphics
Measuring the allocation of control in a 6 degree-of-freedom docking experiment
Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
3D scene manipulation with 2D devices and constraints
GRIN'01 No description on Graphics interface 2001
Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Separating the effects of level of immersion and 3D interaction techniques
Proceedings of the ACM symposium on Virtual reality software and technology
Semantic pointing for object picking in complex 3D environments
GI '08 Proceedings of graphics interface 2008
Assessing the Effects of Orientation and Device on (Constrained) 3D Movement Techniques
3DUI '08 Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces
INTERACT '09 Proceedings of the 12th IFIP TC 13 International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Part II
Hi-index | 0.00 |
We present a study investigating the performance in a 3D object manipulation task with a mouse and a dedicated input device (SpaceNavigator). Previous research delivered ambiguous results about the performance in different 3D tasks. Therefore we used placement (only translation) as well as docking (translation and rotation) tasks. Twelve participants experienced with 3D software took part in the study. They had to translate and rotate 30 cubes with the mouse and the SpaceNavigator (altogether 60 tasks) to place them on a chessboard in Autodesk Maya. The results show an outperformance of the mouse over the SpaceNavigator in the placement tasks but not in the docking tasks, which require a higher extent of object manipulation. Although the SpaceNavigator did not outperform the mouse, considering the number of tasks with the SpaceNavigator and further results of the study (like the learning effect and subjective feedback), the usage of a higher degree-of-freedom device for tasks with multiple simultaneous object manipulations seems reasonable.