Decision dynamics in two high reliability military organizations
Management Science
A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems
MIS Quarterly - Special issue on intensive research in information systems
Reflective systems development
Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems
The Cathedral and the Bazaar
Risk Mitigation in Virtual Organizations
Organization Science
Instabilities of Strategic Alliances: An Internal Tensions Perspective
Organization Science
On the Dialectics of Strategic Alliances
Organization Science
Corporate Information Strategy and Management: Text and Cases
Corporate Information Strategy and Management: Text and Cases
From Organization Design to Organization Designing
Organization Science
CROSSROADS---Introduction to Mindfulness
Organization Science
Mindfulness and the Quality of Organizational Attention
Organization Science
Learning to Implement Enterprise Systems: An Exploratory Study of the Dialectics of Change
Journal of Management Information Systems
The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable
The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable
Middle range theorizing about information technology impact: a study of 3d cad impact on construction work practices
Review: The paradoxes of knowledge management: An eastern philosophical perspective
Information and Organization
Innovating mindfully with information technology
MIS Quarterly
Reliability, mindfulness, and information systems
MIS Quarterly
Organizing for Innovation in the Digitized World
Organization Science
Beyond the computer: Changing medium from digital to physical
Information and Organization
Hi-index | 0.00 |
In unpredictable and unforgiving environments, organizations need to act with care and reliability, often referred to as collective mindfulness. We present a theory-generating, interpretative field study of a highly complex and successful building project by architect Frank O. Gehry. We argue that what has been labeled collective mindfulness is only possible through a dialectic process of collective minding, in which organizational actors simultaneously exhibit elements of being mindful and mindless. Our analysis reveals that collective minding emerges from struggling with contradictions in the five elements of mindfulness. We argue that when actors struggle with these dialectic tensions, the same information technology capabilities are enacted as multiple, contradictory technologies-in-practice. Implications for the further study of collective minding and the appropriation of IT capabilities are discussed.