Temperature-aware microarchitecture
Proceedings of the 30th annual international symposium on Computer architecture
Temperature-aware microarchitecture: Modeling and implementation
ACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization (TACO)
System level leakage reduction considering the interdependence of temperature and leakage
Proceedings of the 41st annual Design Automation Conference
Microarchitectural floorplanning under performance and thermal tradeoff
Proceedings of the conference on Design, automation and test in Europe: Proceedings
Accurate temperature-dependent integrated circuit leakage power estimation is easy
Proceedings of the conference on Design, automation and test in Europe
LEAF: A System Level Leakage-Aware Floorplanner for SoCs
ASP-DAC '07 Proceedings of the 2007 Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference
Cell-level placement for improving substrate thermal distribution
IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems
Power profiling-guided floorplanner for thermal optimization in 3D multiprocessor architectures
PATMOS'11 Proceedings of the 21st international conference on Integrated circuit and system design: power and timing modeling, optimization, and simulation
Hi-index | 0.00 |
At system level, the on-chip temperature depends both on power density and the thermal coupling with the neighboring regions. The problem of finding the right set of input power profile(s) for accurate temperature estimation has not been studied. Considering only average or peak power density may lead either to underestimation or overestimation of the thermal crisis, respectively. To provide more realistic temperature estimation, we propose to incorporate multiple power profiles. Using the proposed statistical methods to determine the closeness between the power profiles, we apply a clustering algorithm to identify few input power profiles. We incorporate them in a thermal-aware floorplanner and empirical results show that using the single input power profile (average or peak) leads to 37% degradation in critical wire delay and 20% degradation in wire length, compared to using the multiple input power profiles.