Now let's do it in practice: user experience evaluation methods in product development
CHI '08 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
User experience evaluation: do you know which method to use?
CHI '09 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
User experience evaluation methods: current state and development needs
Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Extending Boundaries
User experience evaluation - which method to choose?
INTERACT'11 Proceedings of the 13th IFIP TC 13 international conference on Human-computer interaction - Volume Part IV
Personal and Ubiquitous Computing
Enriching Archaeological Parks with Contextual Sounds and Mobile Technology
ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI)
Designing interactive systems for the experience of time
Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
High quality user experience (UX) has become a central competitive factor of product development in mature consumer markets [1]. Although the term UX originated from industry and is a widely used term also in academia, the tools for managing UX in product development are still inadequate. A prerequisite for designing delightful UX in an industrial setting is to understand both the requirements tied to the pragmatic level of functionality and interaction and the requirements pertaining to the hedonic level of personal human needs, which motivate product use [2]. Understanding these requirements helps managers set UX targets for product development. The next phase in a good user-centered design process is to iteratively design and evaluate prototypes [3]. Evaluation is critical for systematically improving UX. In many approaches to UX, evaluation basically needs to be postponed until the product is fully or at least almost fully functional. However, in an industrial setting, it is very expensive to find the UX failures only at this phase of product development. Thus, product development managers and developers have a strong need to conduct UX evaluation as early as possible, well before all the parts affecting the holistic experience are available. Different types of products require evaluation on different granularity and maturity levels of a prototype. For example, due to its multi-user characteristic, a community service or an enterprise resource planning system requires a broader scope of UX evaluation than a microwave oven or a word processor that is meant for a single user at a time. Before systematic UX evaluation can be taken into practice, practical, lightweight UX evaluation methods suitable for different types of products and different phases of product readiness are needed. A considerable amount of UX research is still about the conceptual frameworks and models for user experience [4]. Besides, applying existing usability evaluation methods (UEMs) without adaptation to evaluate UX may lead to some scoping issues. Consequently, there is a strong need to put UX evaluation from research into practice.