Multiple Scan Chains for Power Minimization during Test Application in Sequential Circuits
IEEE Transactions on Computers
An Analysis of Powe Reduction Techniques in Scan Testing
ITC '01 Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE International Test Conference
Simultaneous Reduction of Dynamic and Static Power in Scan Structures
Proceedings of the conference on Design, Automation and Test in Europe - Volume 2
Generation of Primary Input Blocking Pattern for Power Minimization during Scan Testing
Journal of Electronic Testing: Theory and Applications
A critical-path-aware partial gating approach for test power reduction
ACM Transactions on Design Automation of Electronic Systems (TODAES)
Scan Shift Power Reduction by Freezing Power Sensitive Scan Cells
Journal of Electronic Testing: Theory and Applications
Low-power scan operation in test compression environment
IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems
Gating internal nodes to reduce power during scan shift
Proceedings of the 20th symposium on Great lakes symposium on VLSI
On reducing scan shift activity at RTL
IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems
Power-safe application of tdf patterns to flip-chip designs during wafer test
ACM Transactions on Design Automation of Electronic Systems (TODAES)
Observation-Oriented ATPG and Scan Chain Disabling for Capture Power Reduction
Journal of Electronic Testing: Theory and Applications
Hi-index | 0.04 |
This paper proposes a novel technique to minimize the switching activity of full-scan circuits during test application time. The basic idea is to identify an input control pattern (CP) for a full-scan circuit such that by applying the pattern to the primary inputs of the circuit during the scan operation, the switching activity in the combinational part can be reduced or even eliminated. A D-algorithm-like CP generator is developed to generate the CP. This input control technique can be utilized together with the existing vector ordering or latch ordering techniques. Experimental results show that the vector ordering and the latch ordering techniques can achieve 22.37% of average improvement by redoing the experiments in previous work using our test sets, while 34.23% average improvement can be achieved if the input control technique is employed after the latch ordering and vector ordering techniques