Evolving the scope of user-centered design
Communications of the ACM
Assessing a Firm's Web Presence: A Heuristic Evaluation Procedure for the Measurement of Usability
Information Systems Research
A method to standardize usability metrics into a single score
Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Current practice in measuring usability: Challenges to usability studies and research
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
Extending Quality in Use to Provide a Framework for Usability Measurement
HCD 09 Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Human Centered Design: Held as Part of HCI International 2009
The role played by perceived usability, satisfaction and consumer trust on website loyalty
Information and Management
Dogmas in the assessment of usability evaluation methods
Behaviour & Information Technology
Performance evaluation on quality of Asian e-government websites – an AHP approach
International Journal of Business Information Systems
A comparison of Asian e-government websites quality: using a non-parametric test
International Journal of Business Information Systems
Measuring web usability using item response theory: Principles, features and opportunities
Interacting with Computers
Using fuzzy AHP for evaluating the dimensions of data quality
International Journal of Business Information Systems
Information Resources Management Journal
Hi-index | 0.00 |
User acceptance of websites is a critical success factor for e-commerce firms. Usability has long been recognised as a major factor in the acceptance of websites but has been problematic in terms of formal analysis. This paper presents a usability analysis model based on the Microsoft usability guidelines MUG. The model employs the analytic hierarchy process AHP, a decision-making methodology that allows importance ranking to be determined and alternatives compared based on a set of multi-level criteria. AHP decomposes complex decisions into a hierarchy consisting of increasingly more detailed but easily comprehended sub-problems. The MUG provides a conceptualisation of usability based on five high-level criteria that are then broken down into 14 sub-criteria. It is proposed that the MUG naturally presents a hierarchy for system evaluation that can be structured and analysed using the AHP. This paper presents a model and demonstrates its use by comparing three financial information portals.