Is redundancy necessary to reduce delay

  • Authors:
  • Kurt Keutzer;Sharad Malik;Alexander Saldanha

  • Affiliations:
  • AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ;University of California, Berkeley, CA;University of California, Berkeley, CA

  • Venue:
  • DAC '90 Proceedings of the 27th ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference
  • Year:
  • 1991

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Logic optimization procedures principally attempt to optimize three criteria: performance, area and testability. The relationship between area optimization and testability has recently been explored. As to the relationship between performance and testability, experience has shown that performance optimizations can, and do in practice, introduce single stuck-at-fault redundancies into designs. Are these redundancies necessary to increase performance or are they only an unnecessary byproduct of performance optimization? In this paper we give a constructive resolution of this question in the form of an algorithm that takes as input a combinational circuit and returns an irredundant circuit that is as fast. We demonstrate the utility of this algorithm on a well known circuit, the carry-skip adder, and present a novel irredundant design of that adder. As our algorithm may either increase or decrease circuit area, we leave unresolved the question as to whether every circuit has an irredundant circuit that is at least as fast and is of equal or lesser area.