Identifying word correspondence in parallel texts
HLT '91 Proceedings of the workshop on Speech and Natural Language
A systematic comparison of various statistical alignment models
Computational Linguistics
The mathematics of statistical machine translation: parameter estimation
Computational Linguistics - Special issue on using large corpora: II
Classifier combination for improved lexical disambiguation
COLING '98 Proceedings of the 17th international conference on Computational linguistics - Volume 1
Combining clues for word alignment
EACL '03 Proceedings of the tenth conference on European chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics - Volume 1
A cheap and fast way to build useful translation lexicons
COLING '02 Proceedings of the 19th international conference on Computational linguistics - Volume 1
Improved statistical alignment models
ACL '00 Proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics
TREQ-AL: a word alignment system with limited language resources
HLT-NAACL-PARALLEL '03 Proceedings of the HLT-NAACL 2003 Workshop on Building and using parallel texts: data driven machine translation and beyond - Volume 3
COLING '04 Proceedings of the 20th international conference on Computational Linguistics
Word alignment for languages with scarce resources using bilingual corpora of other language pairs
COLING-ACL '06 Proceedings of the COLING/ACL on Main conference poster sessions
Pivot language approach for phrase-based statistical machine translation
Machine Translation
Exploiting aligned parallel corpora in multilingual studies and applications
IWIC'07 Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Intercultural collaboration
Why don't Romanians have a five o'clock tea, Nor Halloween, but have a kind of Valentines day?
CICLing'08 Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Computational linguistics and intelligent text processing
Hi-index | 0.00 |
We briefly describe a word alignment system that combines two different methods in bitext correspondences identification. The first one is a hypotheses testing approach (Gale and Church, 1991; Melamed, 2001; Tufiş 2002) while the second one is closer to a model estimating approach (Brown et al., 1993; Och and Ney, 2000). We show that combining the two aligners the results are significantly improved as compared to each individual aligner.