Awareness and coordination in shared workspaces
CSCW '92 Proceedings of the 1992 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work
A comparative content analysis of face-to-face vs. asynchronous group decision making
Decision Support Systems
Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams
Organization Science
An analysis of communication mode in group support systems research
Decision Support Systems
Students' reflection on online self-correction and peer review to improve writing
Computers & Education
Group awareness of social and cognitive behavior in a CSCL environment
ICLS '10 Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of the Learning Sciences - Volume 1
Group awareness tools for learning: Current and future directions
Computers in Human Behavior
Group awareness tools: It's what you do with it that matters
Computers in Human Behavior
Group awareness in CSCL environments
Computers in Human Behavior
Knowledge hoarding and user acceptance of online discussion board systems in eLearning: A case study
Computers in Human Behavior
Computers in Human Behavior
Evaluating the value of collaboration systems in collocated teams: A longitudinal analysis
Computers in Human Behavior
Emotion understanding and performance during computer-supported collaboration
Computers in Human Behavior
Computers in Human Behavior
Computers in Human Behavior
Hi-index | 0.00 |
This study investigated the effects of a peer feedback tool and a reflection tool on social and cognitive performance during computer supported collaborative learning (CSCL). A CSCL-environment was augmented with a peer feedback tool (Radar) and a reflection tool (Reflector) in order to make group members aware of both their individual and their group behavior. Radar visualizes how group members perceive their own social and cognitive performance and that of their peers during collaboration along five dimensions. Reflector stimulates group members to reflect upon their own performance and the performance of the group. A 2x2 factorial between-subjects design was used to examine whether Radar and Reflector would lead to better team development, more group satisfaction, lower levels of group conflict, more positive attitudes toward problem-based collaboration, and a better group product. Results show that groups with Radar perceived their team as being better developed, experienced lower conflict levels, and had a more positive attitude towards collaborative problem solving than groups without Radar. The quality of group products, however, did not differ. The results demonstrate that peer feedback on the social performance of individual group members can enhance the performance and attitudes of a CSCL-group.