An exact gate assignment algorithm for tree circuits under rise and fall delays

  • Authors:
  • Arlindo L. Oliveira;Rajeev Murgai

  • Affiliations:
  • Cadence European Labs./IST-INESC, Lisboa, Portugal;Fujitsu Laboratories of America, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA

  • Venue:
  • Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE/ACM international conference on Computer-aided design
  • Year:
  • 2000

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

In most libraries, gate parameters such as the pin-to-pin intrinsic delays, load-dependent coefficients, and input pin capacitances have different values for rising and falling signals. The performance optimization algorithms, however, assume a single value for each parameter.It is known that under the load-independent delay model, the gate assignment (or resizing) problem is solvable in time polynomial in the circuit size when a single value is assumed for each parameter [5]. In the presence of different rise and fall parameter values, this problem was recently shown to be NP-complete even for chain and tree topology circuits under the simple load-independent delay model [8]. In this paper, we propose a dynamic programming algorithm for solving this problem exactly in pseudo-polynomial time for tree circuits. More specifically, we show that the problem can be solved in time proportional to the size of the tree circuit, the number of choices available in the library for each gate, and the delay of the circuit. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first pseudo-polynomial exact algorithm for the gate assignment problem for trees in the presence of different rise and fall delays. We present a straightforward way of extending this algorithm to general directed acyclic graphs. We present experimental results on a set of benchmark problems using a standard commercial library and show that our algorithm generates provably optimum delays for 72 out of 76 circuits. We also compare our technique with two approaches traditionally used to solve this problem in the industry & academia and show that it is slightly better than these two. Interestingly, both traditional approaches also yield delays not far from the optimum.