Structuring time and task in electronic brainstorming
MIS Quarterly - Special issue on intensive research in information systems
Understanding it adoption decisions in small business: integrating current theories
Information and Management
Generalizing Generalizability in Information Systems Research
Information Systems Research
Students as Surrogates for managers in a decision-making environment: an experimental study
Journal of Management Information Systems - Special section: Strategic and competitive information systems
Research Note: The Influence of Recommendations and Consumer Reviews on Evaluations of Websites
Information Systems Research
Research in Information Systems: An Empirical Study of Diversity in the Discipline and Its Journals
Journal of Management Information Systems
Information Systems Research
Complementarities Between Organizational IT Architecture and Governance Structure
Information Systems Research
Validating instruments in MIS research
MIS Quarterly
Trust and TAM in online shopping: an integrated model
MIS Quarterly
A task-based model of perceived website complexity
MIS Quarterly
Information Systems Research
Consuming information systems: An economic model of user satisfaction
Decision Support Systems
Ubiquitous use of mobile social network services
Telematics and Informatics
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Information systems researchers, like those in many other disciplines in the social sciences, have debated the value and appropriateness of using students as research subjects. This debate appears in several articles that have been published on the subject as well as in the review process. In this latter arena, however, the debate has become increasingly like a script---the actors (authors and reviewers) simply read their parts of the script; some avoid the underlying issues whereas others cursorily address generalizability without real consideration of those issues. As a result, despite the extent of debate, we seem no closer to a resolution. Authors who use student subjects rely on their scripted arguments to justify the use of student subjects and do not always consider whether those arguments are valid. But reviewers who oppose the use of student subjects are equally culpable. They, too, rely on scripted arguments to criticize work using student subjects, and do not always consider whether those arguments are salient to the particular study. By presenting and reviewing one version of this script in the context of theoretical discussions of generalizability, we hope to demonstrate its limitations so that we can move beyond these scripted arguments into a more meaningful discussion. To do this, we review empirical studies from the period 1990--2010 to examine the extent to which student subjects are being used in the field and to critically assess the discussions within the field about the use of student samples. We conclude by presenting recommendations for authors and reviewers, for determining whether the use of students is appropriate in a particular context, and for presenting and discussing work that uses student subjects.