The Inmates Are Running the Asylum
The Inmates Are Running the Asylum
The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction
The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction
Proceedings of the 2003 conference on Designing for user experiences
Technology as Experience
The Persona Lifecycle: Keeping People in Mind Throughout Product Design
The Persona Lifecycle: Keeping People in Mind Throughout Product Design
When second wave HCI meets third wave challenges
Proceedings of the 4th Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction: changing roles
Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
DPPI '07 Proceedings of the 2007 conference on Designing pleasurable products and interfaces
Damaged merchandise? a review of experiments that compare usability evaluation methods
Human-Computer Interaction
Getting there: six meta-principles and interaction design
Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Dogmas in the assessment of usability evaluation methods
Behaviour & Information Technology
UCD: critique via parody and a sequel
CHI '12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Design isn't a shape and it hasn't got a centre: thinking BIG about post-centric interaction design
Proceedings of the International Conference on Multimedia, Interaction, Design and Innovation
Hi-index | 0.00 |
HCI has developed rich understandings of people at work and at play with technology, moving beyond users' minds to their moods, buddies and bodies. However, understandings of designers remain trapped within the information processing paradigm of first wave HCI, remaining focused on minds that execute design methods as if they were computer programs, and producing the same results on a range of architectures and hardware. Designers are people too, with minds, moods, buddies and bodies, which all interfere substantially (generally to good effects) with the 'code' of design methods. We need to take full account of designers' humanity when assessing design and evaluation methods. This juried alt.chi paper moves from critique to a logocentric proposal based on resource function vocabularies as a more appropriate basis for understanding and assessing methods.