Built-in test for VLSI: pseudorandom techniques
Built-in test for VLSI: pseudorandom techniques
Proceedings of the IEEE International Test Conference on Discover the New World of Test and Design
Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE/ACM international conference on Computer-aided design
On the Use of Counters for Reproducing Deterministic Test Sets
IEEE Transactions on Computers
Mixed-Mode BIST Using Embedded Processors
Journal of Electronic Testing: Theory and Applications - Special issue on On-line testing
A Method for Designing a Deterministic Test Pattern Generator Based on Cellular Automata
Journal of Electronic Testing: Theory and Applications
A Ring Architecture Strategy for BIST Test Pattern Generation
Journal of Electronic Testing: Theory and Applications
Deterministic Test Pattern Reproduction by a Counter
EDTC '96 Proceedings of the 1996 European conference on Design and Test
Deterministic Pattern Generation for Weighted Random Pattern Testing
EDTC '96 Proceedings of the 1996 European conference on Design and Test
On the Generation of Pseudo-Deterministic Two-Patterns Test Sequence with LFSRs
EDTC '97 Proceedings of the 1997 European conference on Design and Test
Implicit test pattern generation constrained to cellular automata embedding
VTS '97 Proceedings of the 15th IEEE VLSI Test Symposium
An optimized BIST test pattern generator for delay testing
VTS '97 Proceedings of the 15th IEEE VLSI Test Symposium
On Using Machine Learning for Logic BIST
ITC '97 Proceedings of the 1997 IEEE International Test Conference
A BIST Pattern Generator Design for Near-Perfect Fault Coverage
IEEE Transactions on Computers
Hi-index | 0.01 |
Deterministic testing is by far the most interesting Built-in Self-Test (BIST) technique due to the minimal number of test patterns it requires and to its predefined fault coverage. However, such a technique is not applicable since despite their efficiency the existing deterministic test pattern generators are enormous consumers of overhead silicon area. Therefore, we propose a mixed test scheme which consists in applying to the circuit under test, a pseudo-random test sequence followed by a deterministic one obtained from an ATPG tool. This scheme allows a maximal fault coverage detection to be achieved for complex and realistic faults, e.g. stuck-at, stuck-open or delay faults, moreover, the silicon area overhead of the mixed hardware generator is drastically reduced. A compromise is to be found between the silicon area overhead of this generator and a slightly longer mixed test sequence. As an example, the additional circuitry requirements of the mixed test pattern hardware generator for the C3540 circuit are reduced to 20% of the nominal chip size for a total set of 1000 mixed test patterns.