Approximating power indices

  • Authors:

  • Yoram Bachrach;Evangelos Markakis;Ariel D. Procaccia;Jeffrey S. Rosenschein;Amin Saberi

  • Affiliations:

  • Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel;Center for Mathematics and Computer Science (CWI), Amsterdam, the Netherlands;Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel;Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel;Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA

  • Venue:
  • Proceedings of the 7th international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems - Volume 2
  • Year:
  • 2008

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Many multiagent domains where cooperation among agents is crucial to achieving a common goal can be modeled as coalitional games. However, in many of these domains, agents are unequal in their power to affect the outcome of the game. Prior research on weighted voting games has explored power indices, which reflect how much "real power" a voter has. Although primarily used for voting games, these indices can be applied to any simple coalitional game. Computing these indices is known to be computationally hard in various domains, so one must sometimes resort to approximate methods for calculating them. We suggest and analyze randomized methods to approximate power indices such as the Banzhaf power index and the Shapley-Shubik power index. Our approximation algorithms do not depend on a specific representation of the game, so they can be used in any simple coalitional game. Our methods are based on testing the game's value for several sample coalitions. We also show that no approximation algorithm can do much better for general coalitional games, by providing lower bounds for both deterministic and randomized algorithms for calculating power indices.